Wednesday, August 08, 2007

@!$#JIOE

So if any of you clicked on the curtains pic in my last post, you'll no doubt notice the extremely poor quality of the photo.

I think my digital camera is skrood. Which really blows because we just got it over a year ago. Tons of noise on the digital display which seems to also transfer to the picture itself.

You know the worst part? This thing got the highest rating from Consumer Reports. Love the size but the picture quality has degraded to being nearly worthless.

Suggestions on where to go next?

UPDATE: I've emailed Costco where we purchased the camera to see if they will still do an exchange. We'll see how fabulous their return policy really is.

7 comments:

chelene said...

A friend of mine has a really great Pentax DL. Not sure how much you're looking to spend but her camera takes fantastic pictures.

Slave to the dogs said...

Chel, thanks. I think our mistake was buying a brand that isn't known for its cameras. It's a Casio.

Anonymous said...

I did notice the 'haze' but I just figured you were being all artistic and stuff - you know, vaselining the lense.

Slave to the dogs said...

Rhet - maybe the vaseline on the lens is what screwed up the camera to begin with!

Anonymous said...

Lol...Casio, not a panophonic, or sonya?

You would think a basic warranty would cover the year, unless according to murphy's law, it is just out?

Slave to the dogs said...

Mur, unfortunately we're a few months past the year.

Anonymous said...

I said vaseline not KY!
Sheesh, get your mind out of the gutter!